Skip to main content
2010 ElectionsReleases

Gubernatorial Advertising Up Dramatically This Year

By October 21, 2010July 28th, 2016No Comments

Overall Volume is Double 2006 Level;

Outside Group Advertising Has Tripled;

California, Florida, Wisconsin, Ohio Inundated by Ads

(MIDDLETOWN, CT) Oct. 21, 2010 – The volume of advertising in the 37 states holding gubernatorial races this November is up dramatically over the volume of advertising aired up to this point in 2006.   A Wesleyan Media Project analysis of gubernatorial race airings between September 1 and October 7, 2010, finds that almost 300,000 ads have been aired across the country in gubernatorial races, double the volume aired in 2006.  Candidates accounted for 72 percent of those ads, while parties accounted for another 16.2 percent.  Independent groups financed almost 12 percent of the ads, an increase from the 7.4 percent that they financed in 2006.

***For a pdf of the full release, click here.
***Table formats: pdf, xls, or zipped xml (note: xls and xml have more information).
***For a NEW TABLE of Top IG spenders in GOV races, select your format: pdf, xls, zipped xml

Table 1. Advertising in Gubernatorial Races 9/1-10/7*

Table formats: pdf, xls, or zipped xml

One big story this year is the role that outside groups are playing in gubernatorial races.  These groups have more than tripled their involvement in terms of the number of ads they have aired on behalf of candidates running for governor,” said Travis Ridout, associate professor of political science at Washington State University and co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project.

What explains the more than doubling of advertising this election season from 2006?

In part, this is a reflection of the extremely competitive environment this year,” said Michael Franz, associate professor of government at Bowdoin College and co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project.  “A third of the races for governor are legitimate tossups,” he added.

Table 2 shows that the state that has seen the most gubernatorial ads is California, where an estimated $35 million was spent on 51,519 ad spots in the September 1 to October 7 time period.  (Figures in this table include all candidate-, party- and independent group-sponsored ads).  Most of the California ads were paid for by the candidates themselves, though the Republican ad advantage is not as large as one might expect given Republican candidate Meg Whitman’s proven ability to self-finance her campaign.   During all of 2010, Whitman’s campaign aired just under 175,000 spots in California.  Floridians have also been hit hard by television advertising, with over 44,000 spots being aired in the state during the post-September 1 period.  Two Midwestern states with close gubernatorial races, Wisconsin and Ohio, races each saw over 19,000 ad airings worth an estimated $8 million in each state.

Table 2. Ad Airings in Top 25 Gubernatorial Races, by State

Table formats: pdf, xls, or zipped xml

Across all races, there were just slightly more pro-Republicans ads than pro-Democratic ads aired, with pro-Republican ads accounting for 50.3 percent of the total ad airings.  (Information on gubernatorial advertising in additional states is available on the project website at:  Among the states that saw at least 100 ad airings, Republicans held the greatest advantage in terms of percentage of total ads aired in Tennessee, South Dakota, Iowa, Oklahoma and Alabama.  Democrats held the greatest percentage advantage in total ad airings in Arkansas, Colorado, Alaska, Rhode Island and New York.

Sometimes lost amidst the focus on Citizens United and control of Congress this year is the fact that key battlegrounds in gubernatorial races may fundamentally shape the political landscape on important policy issues, not to mention redistricting,” said Erika Franklin Fowler, assistant professor of government at Wesleyan University and co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project. “The sheer volume of advertising is one prime indication that both sides understand how high the stakes are.”

The Wesleyan Media Project provides real-time tracking and analysis of all political television advertising in real-time. Housed in Wesleyan’s Quantitative Analysis Center –part of the Allbritton Center for the Study of Public Life – the Wesleyan Media Project is the successor to the Wisconsin Advertising Project, which disbanded in 2009.  It is directed by Erika Franklin Fowler, assistant professor of government at Wesleyan University and her collaborators Michael M. Franz, associate professor of government at Bowdoin College and Travis N. Ridout, associate professor of political science at Washington State University.

The Wesleyan Media Project is supported by grants from John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, The Sunlight Foundation, Wesleyan University, and its partner institutions Bowdoin College and Washington State University.  Data are provided by Kantar Media/CMAG with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project using Academiclip, a web-based coding tool.  All spending numbers are estimates.

For more information contact:

David Pesci at 860-685-5612 or dpesci at
Erika Franklin Fowler at 860-685-3407 or efowler at
Michael M. Franz at 207-798-4318 or mfranz at, or
Travis N. Ridout at 509-335-2264 or tnridout at