Skip to main content

Groups account for over 60 percent of spending

(MIDDLETOWN, CT) March 5, 2026 – Spending on political advertising in the 2026 races for U.S. House and U.S. Senate has reached $565 million cycle-to-date, ahead of the first round of party primaries this week. The total – which includes spending from January 1, 2025, through March 1, 2026 – has been boosted by high levels of spending from groups, which have accounted for over 60 percent of total ad spending in both the Senate and the House.

Table 1 shows ad spending in the 2025-26 election cycle, with spending broken down across race type—House, Senate and governor—and by medium—broadcast TV, cable TV, radio, satellite TV, digital, and connected TV (CTV), which includes streaming and within-app advertising.

Perhaps the most notable finding in the table is that broadcast TV accounts for a relatively low percentage of the ad spending in House and Senate races to date, just 39 percent and 35 percent, respectively. In fact, spending on CTV ads in Senate races is greater than spending on broadcast television ($116 v. $112 million). CTV ads in House races roughly equaled early spending on digital platforms, but digital advertising in Senate races amounted to half the total for CTV.

Although total ad spending on races for governor outpaces spending on House and Senate races, note that the governor totals include the now-decided races for governor in Virginia and New Jersey in November 2025. The gubernatorial campaign in Virginia featured over $80 million in political ads, and political ads in New Jersey totaled over $200 million, across all sponsors. All told, political ad spending in the cycle-to-date for congressional and gubernatorial races, including elections held in 2025, totaled over $1 billion.

Table 1: Cycle to Date Spending (Ms) by Medium in Congressional and Gubernatorial Races (1/1/25 to 3/1/26)

House% of spendSenate% of spendGov% of spend
BroadcastSpend$92.05 38.5$112.53 34.5$198.69 43.7
Airings155,411175,268253,986
CableSpend$28.97 12.1$35.46 10.9$60.38 13.3
RadioSpend$6.58 2.7$3.68 1.1$6.74 1.5
SatelliteSpend$0.96 0.4$4.11 1.3$2.54 0.6
CTVSpend$51.12 21.4$116.70 35.8$139.04 30.6
DigitalSpend$59.49 24.9$53.53 16.4$47.59 10.5
Total $$239.17 $326.02 $454.99
CTV includes spending on streaming, CTV devices and in-app ads.
Digital includes spending on Meta, Google, Snapchat, and Twitter/X
CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project.

Remarkably, the vast majority of the spending to this point in U.S. House and U.S. Senate races has come from outside groups, not from candidates or parties (Table 2).  Almost 65 percent of spending in House races and 61 percent of spending in Senate races has come from outside groups.  This level of activity by groups is very large compared to typical general election activity but not without precedent this early in a campaign.  A Wesleyan Media Project comparison of 2026 broadcast airings reveals that group activity in U.S. House races comprised 63 percent of total airings, with U.S. Senate group activity comprising 56 percent. This compares to 63 percent and 60 percent respectively from the comparable period in 2022.

Coordinated spending, most often joint fund-raising committees where candidates raise funds alongside other candidates or political action committees, has been minimal—just $2.3 million in House races and $14.42 million in Senate races.  (The bulk of the coordinated spending in Senate races was on behalf of Republican John Cornyn in Texas, by the Cornyn Lonestar Victory Fund and the Cornyn Victory Committee.)

Table 2: Cycle to Date Spending (Ms) by Sponsor Type in Congressional and Gubernatorial Races(1/1/25 to 3/1/26)

HouseSenateGov
CandidatesSpend$81.69 $111.48 $266.01
Col %34.234.258.5
Candidate-CoordinatedSpend$2.31 $14.42 $2.26
Col %1.04.40.5
Outside GroupsSpend$155.17 $200.12 $186.73
Col %64.961.441.0
Total$239.17 $326.02 $454.99
Totals include Broadcast, Cable, Radio, Satellite, Digital, and CTV
CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project.

Over $50 Million in Broadcast TV Spending on Texas Senate Race; Total Ad Spending above $120 Million

Table 3 shows that the Texas Senate race, with primaries held earlier this week, is the most expensive Senate race so far, with over $55 million in spending on broadcast TV ads (totaling almost 72,000 ad airings). The three-way Republican nomination contest, featuring incumbent John Cornyn and challengers Ken Paxton and Wesley Hunt, saw over 55,000 ad airings on TV.  The two-way Democratic nomination contest between Jasmine Crockett and James Talarico featured over 16,000 ad airings. Once one adds in spending on CTV, radio and digital ads, total spending in the race for Senate in Texas has exceeded $120 million.

Advertising has also been relatively heavy in the Democratic primary race in Illinois, where three Democrats are facing off for their party’s nomination.  There have been almost 28,000 TV ad airings in the race so far, at a cost of almost $15 million.  The vast bulk of these ads have come from Raja Krishnamoorthi, currently representing the 8th congressional district in Illinois.

Table 3: Broadcast TV Airings and Spending in Senate Races (1/1/25 to 3/1/26)

StateTV airingsTV (in $Ms)Dem groupRep groupDem candRep candDem coord.Rep coord.
TX71,677$55.90 2,434 33,647 13,879 5,554 0 16,163
IL27,824$14.90 4,587 0 22,538 000
KY22,108$10.00 0 2,599 0 9,556 00
ME13,986$11.40 2,812 8,355 1,502 000
LA10,040$4.20 0 6,253 0 2,575 00
WV4,355$1.20 0 2,250 0000
NC4,044$2.40 1,208 321 0000
AK3,934$0.86 0 3,634 0000
AL3,758$1.30 0 3,155 0 603 00
IA3,005$2.20 927 1,422 0000
GA2,836$4.50 528 817 0 1,491 00
AR1,861$0.95 0 1,341 24 496 00
KS1,599$0.94 0 266 0000
MS1,178$0.12 00 356 822 00
SD923$0.19 000 335 00
CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project.

Broadcast TV Ads in House Races Ramping Up

Top U.S. House races, ranked by broadcast TV ad airings, are shown in Table 4. The special election in Tennessee’s 7th congressional district in October of 2025 is atop the list, with over $5 million of spending on 8500 ad airings.  Second on the list is Arizona’s 6th congressional district, which many prognosticators put into a “tossup” category for the midterm elections.  All of the spending so far in that race has been on the Democratic side, and from outside groups.  Several candidates are seeking the party’s nomination in a bid to defeat the Republican incumbent, Juan Ciscomani. Early spending from outside groups has focused on attacking Ciscomani.

There were primaries in House races on March 3 in Texas, Arkansas, and North Carolina.  Four House races in those states are featured in Table 4.  In TX-34, which is expected to be one of the most competitive House races this fall, there were over 5,000 broadcast spots in the run-up to the primary.  Most of the ads were on the GOP side, with ads from groups attacking the Democratic opponent and from the Republican winner of the primary, Eric Flores.  In TX-32, the district has been re-drawn to be a safe Republican one, so the nomination campaign primarily featured three GOP candidates, with an outside group airing ads to promote one of them (Jace Yarbrough).  In TX-15, all of the ads were on the Democratic side, where two Democrats battled for the nomination to face off against the Republican incumbent, Monica De La Cruz.  Finally, over 5,000 spots aired in NC-01, where several Republican candidates battled for the nomination to run against a highly vulnerable Democratic incumbent, Don Davis.  Several outside groups have aired ads attacking Davis, while some pro-Davis ads have also aired.

Table 4: Broadcast TV Airings and Spending in House Races (1/1/25 to 3/1/26)

DistrictTV
airings
TV
(in $Ms)
Dem
group
Rep
group
Dem
candidate
Rep
candidate
Dem
coord.
Rep
coord.
TN07 8,556 $5.20 1,055 2,756 1,480 2,295 0970
AZ06 6,602 $2.30 6,091 00000
FL06 5,655 $5.20 0 2,254 2,605 00727
AZ07 5,478 $0.93 927 0 4,361 19000
TX34 5,325 $1.60 637 1,376 0 3,312 00
NC01 5,218 $2.00 1,079 2,438 0 1,701 00
KY04 4,819 $2.50 0 2,359 0 2,460 00
FL01 4,610 $2.40 0 1,076 2,746 71800
PA10 4,244 $2.90 4,002 242 0000
TX32 3,859 $2.40 0 844 0 3,015 00
ME02 3,795 $1.80 1,393 2,395 7000
GA14 3,533 $0.77 0 431 810 2,292 00
MI07 3,509 $2.50 3,114 395 0000
TX15 3,342 $1.50 1,477 0 1,865 000
IL09 3,333 $3.10 1,665 0 1,668 000
CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project.

Top Groups

Table 5 shows the top group advertisers in the 2025-26 election cycle, ranked by spending.  Atop the list is Greater Garden State, a group that spent over $13 million in support of Democrat Mikie Sherrill in the New Jersey race for governor..  Texans for a Conservative Majority spent over $11 million in support of incumbent Republican John Cornyn in the state’s Republican Senate primary.  A dark money group called Georgians for Integrity has spent over $11 million attacking Georgia Lt. Governor Burt Jones in the Republican primary for governor.

Table 5: Top Group Advertisers on Broadcast TV (1/1/25 to 3/1/26)

AdvertiserAiringsSpending (in $Ms)Senate AiringsHouse AiringsGov AiringsParty Support
Greater Garden State 6,734 $14.70 00 6,734 Democrat
Texans for a Conservative Majority 15,269 $12.10 15,269 00Republican
Georgians for Integrity 10,339 $11.60 00 10,339 Republican
Restore NJ 5,148 $12.10 00 5,148 Republican
One Nation 7,607 $9.90 7,607 00Republican
Affordable New Jersey 3,967 $8.60 00 3,967 Democrat
Lone Star Freedom Project 6,768 $6.20 6,768 00Republican
American Energy Action 13,519 $6.60 8,180 5,339 0Independent
Unrig Our Economy 11,187 $6.20 2,630 8,557 0Democrat
House Majority Forward 10,316 $6.10 0 10,316 0Democrat
CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project.

About the Data

Advertising data reported here for 2025-2026 come from AdImpact with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project. 2021-2022 cycle comparisons come from Wesleyan Media Project analysis of Vivvix CMAG data unless otherwise specified. All cost estimates for ad spending by medium in 2025-26 use AdImpact’s methodology.

The CTV category includes ads distributed over devices where an input is connected to a television (e.g., Apple TV, PlayStation, etc), streaming via set-top-boxes, including video on demand (e.g., Dish or XFINITY streaming) and in apps available on smart TVs (e.g., YouTube or the Hulu app, etc).

About this Report

The Wesleyan Media Project provides real-time tracking and analysis of all political television advertising in an effort to increase transparency in elections. Housed in Wesleyan’s Hazel Quantitative Analysis Center – part of the Allbritton Center for the Study of Public Life – the Wesleyan Media Project is the successor to the Wisconsin Advertising Project, which disbanded in 2009.  It is directed by Erika Franklin Fowler, professor of government at Wesleyan University, Michael M. Franz, professor of government at Bowdoin College and Travis N. Ridout, professor of political science at Washington State University. WMP personnel include Breeze Floyd (Program Manager), Pavel Oleinikov (Associate Director, QAC) and Yujin Kim (Post-Doctoral Fellow).

The Wesleyan Media Project’s real-time tracking in 2026 is supported by Wesleyan University and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

The Wesleyan Media Project’s digital advertising tracking is supported by the contributions of students in Delta Lab, an interdisciplinary research collaborative focusing on computationally-driven and innovative analyses and visualizations of media messaging. We are also grateful to our Coding Supervisors Saul Ferholt-Kahn and Helen Xie and the numerous student research assistants who facilitate additional content analysis of television and digital advertising.

Periodic releases of data will be posted on the project’s website and dispersed via LinkedIn, Bluesky @wesmediaproject.bsky.social and Twitter @wesmediaproject. To be added to our email update list, click here.

For more information contact: media@wesleyan.edu.

About Wesleyan University

Wesleyan University, in Middletown, Conn., is known for the excellence of its academic and co-curricular programs. With more than 2,900 undergraduates and 200 graduate students, Wesleyan is dedicated to providing a liberal arts education characterized by boldness, rigor and practical idealism. For more, visit www.wesleyan.edu.

About the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
We are social investors who support democracy by funding free expression and journalism, arts and culture in community, research in areas of media and democracy, and in the success of American cities and towns where the Knight brothers once had newspapers. Learn more at kf.org and follow @knightfdn on social media.