October 14, 2014
Return to the release “Ad spending in 2014 elections…”
![]()
Figure 1: Advertising Balance in U.S. Senate Races (Sept 26-October 9)
| Media Market | Pro-Dem Ad Airings | Pro-GOP Ad Airings | GOP Ad Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBANY, GA | 362 | 197 | -165 |
| ALBUQUERQUE | 869 | 673 | -196 |
| ALEXANDRIA | 310 | 240 | -70 |
| AMARILLO | 129 | 0 | -129 |
| ANCHORAGE | 1,680 | 1,626 | -54 |
| ATLANTA | 1,273 | 521 | -752 |
| AUGUSTA | 518 | 412 | -106 |
| BANGOR | 376 | 502 | 126 |
| BATON ROUGE | 935 | 552 | -383 |
| BEND | 225 | 29 | -196 |
| BILLINGS | 0 | 309 | 309 |
| BILOXI | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| BLUEFIELD-BECKLEY | 132 | 320 | 188 |
| BOSTON | 824 | 521 | -303 |
| BOWLING GREEN | 293 | 421 | 128 |
| BUTTE | 0 | 58 | 58 |
| CEDAR RAPIDS | 1,808 | 1,646 | -162 |
| CHAMPAIGN | 211 | 14 | -197 |
| CHARLESTON, SC | 0 | 24 | 24 |
| CHARLESTON, WV | 726 | 1,302 | 576 |
| CHARLOTTE | 2,047 | 1,705 | -342 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE | 142 | 70 | -72 |
| CHATTANOOGA | 0 | 52 | 52 |
| CHICAGO | 498 | 74 | -424 |
| CINCINNATI | 812 | 804 | -8 |
| CLARKSBURG | 184 | 508 | 324 |
| COLORADO SPRINGS | 1,650 | 1,343 | -307 |
| COLUMBIA, SC | 0 | 43 | 43 |
| COLUMBUS, GA | 538 | 350 | -188 |
| COLUMBUS/TUPELO | 0 | 33 | 33 |
| DAVENPORT | 974 | 1,246 | 272 |
| DENVER | 2,895 | 2,475 | -420 |
| DES MOINES | 1,738 | 1,812 | 74 |
| DETROIT | 1,010 | 581 | -429 |
| DOTHAN | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| DULUTH | 317 | 76 | -241 |
| EL PASO | 365 | 0 | -365 |
| EUGENE | 616 | 385 | -231 |
| EVANSVILLE | 624 | 777 | 153 |
| FAIRBANKS | 807 | 523 | -284 |
| FARGO | 152 | 76 | -76 |
| FLINT | 666 | 367 | -299 |
| FORT SMITH | 1,226 | 1,275 | 49 |
| GRAND JUNCTION | 277 | 764 | 487 |
| GRAND RAPIDS | 924 | 1,000 | 76 |
| GREAT FALLS | 0 | 131 | 131 |
| GREENSBORO | 1,542 | 1,512 | -30 |
| GREENVILLE, NC | 763 | 3 | -5 |
| GREENVILLE, SC | 865 | 963 | 98 |
| HARRISONBURG | 84 | 73 | -11 |
| HELENA | 0 | 70 | 70 |
| JACKSON, MS | 0 | 33 | 33 |
| JONESBORO | 74 | 85 | 11 |
| JUNEAU | 1,030 | 774 | -256 |
| KANSAS CITY* | 436 | 580 | 144 |
| KNOXVILLE | 54 | 118 | 64 |
| LAFAYETTE, LA | 643 | 543 | -100 |
| LAKE CHARLES | 292 | 121 | -171 |
| LANSING | 493 | 373 | -120 |
| LEXINGTON | 1,087 | 1,529 | 442 |
| LINCOLN | 0 | 64 | 64 |
| LITTLE ROCK | 1,275 | 1,654 | 379 |
| LOUISVILLE | 1,316 | 13 | 0 |
| MACON | 494 | 319 | -175 |
| MANKATO | 84 | 45 | -39 |
| MARQUETTE | 39 | 77 | 38 |
| MEDFORD-KLAMATH FALLS | 391 | 47 | -344 |
| MEMPHIS | 445 | 3 | -2 |
| MINNEAPOLIS | 628 | 135 | -493 |
| MISSOULA | 0 | 315 | 315 |
| MONROE | 794 | 556 | -238 |
| MYRTLE BEACH | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| NASHVILLE | 60 | 94 | 34 |
| NEW ORLEANS | 1,045 | 693 | -352 |
| NORFOLK | 634 | 463 | -171 |
| NORTH PLATTE | 0 | 53 | 53 |
| OKLAHOMA CITY | 0 | 219 | 219 |
| OMAHA | 399 | 536 | 137 |
| OTTUMWA | 281 | 288 | 7 |
| PADUCAH | 541 | 537 | -4 |
| PANAMA CITY | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| PARKERSBURG | 0 | 152 | 152 |
| PEORIA | 203 | 0 | -203 |
| PHILADELPHIA | 277 | 0 | -277 |
| PORTLAND, ME | 531 | 779 | 248 |
| PORTLAND, OR | 856 | 569 | -287 |
| PRESQUE ISLE | 4 | 21 | 17 |
| PROVIDENCE | 450 | 0 | -450 |
| QUINCY | 49 | 120 | 71 |
| RALEIGH | 1,629 | 1,499 | -130 |
| RAPID CITY | 1,023 | 308 | -715 |
| RICHMOND | 466 | 471 | 5 |
| ROANOKE | 742 | 325 | -417 |
| ROCHESTER, MN | 748 | 248 | -500 |
| ROCKFORD | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| SALISBURY | 76 | 0 | -76 |
| SAVANNAH | 534 | 438 | -96 |
| SHERMAN | 0 | 182 | 182 |
| SHREVEPORT | 1,043 | 794 | -249 |
| SIOUX CITY | 870 | 1,254 | 384 |
| SIOUX FALLS | 1,413 | 269 | -1,144 |
| SPRINGFIELD, MO | 196 | 284 | 88 |
| SYRACUSE | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| TOPEKA* | 476 | 436 | -40 |
| TRAVERSE CITY | 314 | 496 | 182 |
| TRI-CITIES | 364 | 162 | -202 |
| TULSA | 0 | 244 | 244 |
| WASHINGTON DC | 650 | 649 | -1 |
| WEST PALM BEACH | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| WHEELING-STEUBEN | 99 | 414 | 315 |
| WICHITA* | 842 | 914 | 72 |
| WILMINGTON | 706 | 746 | 40 |
| Figures are from September 26, 2014, to October 9, 2014. Numbers include broadcast television. *Numbers for independent candidate, Greg Orman, are reported in the Democratic columns. CITE SOURCE OF DATA AS: Kantar Media/CMAG with analysis by the Wesleyan Media Project. |
|||
